Back
Treasury Management
Finance

In-house banking: why is it a strategic priority for finance teams?

February 6, 2025

Today, all companies face many challenges when it comes to managing their money. They want to spend less, control their financial resources and, in general, they have an easy system to manage their finances.

In this context, in-house banking has become a key strategy. This model allows businesses to act as your own bank to manage their money, savings and debts.

In tis article we will explain to you why in-house banking is so useful, the problems that they resolve and how it helps to optimise resources and maintain financial control.

What is in house banking?

In-house banking is a form of organising the finances of a company so that it functions as if it were a bank, but internally. This means that one part of the company handles all payments, collections, loans and all cash for other parts of the same organisation.

Their principle objectives are:

  • Total control of money: A centralised office manages the cash flows and financial resources of all the company
  • Cost savings: It reduces or eliminates commissions and tariffs that external banks usually collect. 
  • Reduction of risks: It optimises the management of financial risks, like exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations.

In essence, in-house banking converts the company into its own financial services provider, offering significant advantages over traditional models.

What problems does in-house banking resolve?

Although, for many businesses, in house-banking is an unknown resource, the reality is that its objective is to resolve many financial problems that companies face today, including the following:

  • Dispersion of resources: In many businesses, the distinct areas or subsidiaries handle their own bank accounts and manage their resources autonomously. This can lead to inefficiencies, duplication of costs and lack of coordination. In-House banking centralises these resources, optimising their use and avoiding unnecessary expenses.
  • Elevated costs for banking services: Fees for transfers, credit lines and other external banking services can accumulate quickly, especially in companies with international operations. In house banking eliminates these commissions by keeping the transactions in-house
  • Limited risk management: In a decentralised financial environment, it is difficult to implement effective strategies to mitigate risks such as foreign currency fluctuations or interest rate changes. With In-House Banking, the company can control and manage these risks centrally.

Advantages of in-house banking

In-house banking offers multiple strategic benefits and operational benefits that make it an essential tool for companies looking to optimise their finances. Below, we explore these advantages in more detail

Efficient use of money

In traditional companies, different departments often operateindependently of each other, which results in less efficient handling of financial resources. This can lead to excess liquidity in some areas that is not used productively and a liquidity deficit in others, forcing them to resort to external borrowing.

In- house banking, on the other hand, establishes an internal system of loans and deposits between the different areas or subsidiaries of the company. This makes it possible to redistribute financial resources effectively, reduce dependence on external loans, save on interest and maximise the return on available cash by investing it in strategic or productive areas.

Better management of risks

In-house banking centralises the company’s financial exposure, which facilitates a more efficient management of the risks associated with financial operations. Centralising financial operations allows for more effective exchange rate hedging, consolidating transactions in different currencies and reducing exposure to foreign exchange risk.

It also facilitates a centralised management of interest rates, with the possibility of negotiating more competitive conditions for loans or investments, taking advantage of economies of scale. This model furthermore prevents unnecessary risks, because it offers an integrated vision of the financial situation, avoiding over-indebtedness or investments in unprofitable instruments.

More control and transparency

One of the main advantages of In-house banking is the centralised control of cash flows, which significantly improves the financial visibility throughout the organisation.

This control allows real time monitoring of how financial resources are being used, preventing fraud through greater supervision of internal and external transactions and facilitates internal and external audits by centralising and standardising financial information.

Furthermore, this increased transparency allows finance teams to make informed decisions based on precise data, which improves corporate planning and strategy.

More efficient processes

In-house banking promotes the automation and standardisation of financial tasks, which reduces the administrative burden and improves operational efficiency. Automated systems significantly reduce human errors in repetitive tasks, such as bank reconciliations or fund transfers.

At the same time, it saves time, because finance teams can dedicate less energy on operational tasks and concentrate on strategic activities such as financial analysis and planning.

It also improves internal coordination by eliminating the need for subsidiaries or departments to negotiate individually with external banks, simplifying financial operations.

Savings in operational and financial costs

The use of the internal baning model eliminates or significantly reduces the costs associated with external financial services, like commissions for international transfers, bank account maintenance fees and interest on loans obtained from external financial institutions.

Centralising financial operations also allows for negotiating more favourable conditions with external banks when necessary, such as credit lines or investment products, taking advantage of the consolidated volume of operations.

Improved financial flexibility

In-house banking allows businesses to respond quickly to changes in the financial environment or to internal needs.

For example, they can redistribute resources between areas or subsidiaries in case of emergencies, strategic projects can be financed internally without recourse to banks, and financial exposure to specific risks, such as exchange rates or interest rates, can be adjusted depending on market conditions. This flexibility is particularly useful in moments of economic uncertainty, allowing businesses to adapt without depending exclusively on external institutions.

How to implement In-House Banking in your company

Implementing In-House Banking can be a transformative process for your business, but it requires detailed planning and a strategic approach to ensure its success. Here are the key steps to take to make it happen:

  1. Analyse the current financial structure of your business:the first step is to undergo an exhaustive diagnosis of your company’s financial situation, including cash flows, loans, investments and financial risks in the different areas of subsidiaries. Identifying weaknesses and opportunities for improvement will allow you to design an internal banking model tailored to the specific needs of your organisation. 
  2. Define the objectives of In-house banking:it is important to set clear goals for In-House Banking. These may include reducing financial costs, improving risk management, centralising treasury operations or increasing transparency. The defined goals will guide strategic decisions during implementation.
  3. Design the operational structure: To implement In-House Banking, it is necessary to define an organisational structure to support its operation. This includes the creation of a centralised treasury centre, which is responsible for managing cash flows, internal lending, risk hedging and relationships with external financial institutions when necessary.
  4. Invest in the right technology: technology plays a key role in the success of In-House Banking. Implementing treasury management software, such as the one we offer at Embat, that automates processes, consolidates financial data in real time and generates clear and accurate reports is essential. In addition, this tool must be integrated with existing ERP systems to ensure a smooth operation.
  5. Train your finance team: The finance team must be prepared to take on new responsibilities and handle the tools associated with In-House Banking. It is essential to provide specific training on centralised resource management, the use of treasury of software and best practices for risk management and internal resource optimisation. 
  6. Establish a transition plan: the transition to a model of In-house Banking should be gradual to minimise interruptions in the daily operations. This involves developing a detailed timeline that includes phases such as centralisation of bank accounts, technology integration and implementation of new internal policies. 
  7. Conduct pilot tests: Before implementing the model on a large scale, it is advisable to conduct pilot tests in one or more subsidiaries of the company. This will allow you to identify potential problems, adjust processes and validate the effectiveness of the model before rolling it out across the organisation. 
  8. Continuously monitor and adjust: Key performance indicators (KPIs) such as financial cost reduction, cash flow optimisation and improved risk management will help measure the success of the model and identify areas for improvement.

Conclusion

In-house banking is not only a way of managing money, but a strategy that can transform how companies manage their financial resources

It offers savings, control, efficiency and an improved ability to cope with market changes. For finance teams, adopting this model is not just an option, but a necessity to remain competitive and ensure a sustainable future

Is your business ready to take this step?

Carlos
Serrano García-Lisón
Co-CEO & Co-Founder @ Embat
Carlos Serrano, Co-CEO and co-founder of Embat, has a solid track record in corporate finance after working at J.P. Morgan and TowerBrook Capital Partners in London. At Embat, he focuses on empowering finance teams in medium and large organisations to deliver strategic value by optimising treasury management and facilitating key decision-making.

Ready to flow?

Contact an expert